Table 1.
Features of covalent protein–protein coupling methods.
| Method | Terminus restriction | Redox dependence | Orthogonal pairs | Scar after coupling | Other features or challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Split intein | N-intein at C-terminus, C-intein at N-terminus | Yes, for Cys-dependent split inteins | Yes | 0–3 aa | – |
| Sortase | C-terminal-LPXTGX and N-terminal oligoglycine/alanine | No | S. aureus and S. pyogenes enzymes | Small (7 aa) | Need high conc. of oligoglycine reactant; challenging to reach complete conjugation |
| Tag/Catcher | Tag or Catcher at N- or C-terminus or internal | No | SpyCatcher, SnoopCatcher | Catcher (≥84 aa) and Tag (12–13 aa) retained | High reaction yield |
| Electrostatic interaction lock | Should not be restricted | Reducing before reaction; oxidizing after reaction | In principle: several coiled-coil pairings known | Moderate (typically 18 aa) | Disulfides may reverse |
| Unnatural amino acid coupling | None | No | Yes | 1 aa in Ag and 1 aa in virus-like particle | Cost/complexity of expression |