Table 1.
Behavioral and neuroscientific studies examining age differences in performance monitoring.
| Study | Method | Age groups | Motivational influence | Paradigm | Main results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gorlick et al., 2013 | Behavioral | 18–35 and 60–82 years | Cognitive feedback (point gain vs. point loss) vs. social feedback (happy vs. angry faces) | Rule learning and set shifting via feedback | Experiment 1 (face feedback): • Minimal load on cognitive control: happy-face feedback attenuated age-related deficits in initial rule learning and angry-face feedback led to age-related deficits in initial rule learning and set shifting |
| • High load on cognitive control: angry-face feedback attenuated age-related deficits in initial rule learning and set shifting whereas happy-face feedback led to age-related deficits in initial rule learning and set shifting | |||||
| Experiment 2 (point feedback): • Age-related deficits in initial rule learning and set shifting under low and high cognitive load for point-gain and point-loss conditions |
|||||
| Kardos et al., 2016a | ERPs | 21–28 and 62–72 years | Points accumulated during experiment are added to participation fee | Balloon Analog Risk Task | • In young, reward positivity increased as function of reward contingencies with largest amplitude for rewarding feedback followed by the decision to stop |
| • Older adults characterized by hesitation and more deliberative decision making, reward positivity did not reflect the effect of reward structure | |||||
| Kardos et al., 2016b | ERPs | 18–32 and | Two amounts of monetary | Gambling task | • Riskier choices after negative feedback |
| 62–72 years | gains/losses | • In young adults, FRN was indicator of goodness of outcome (loss or gain), P3 showed a complex picture of feedback evaluation with selective sensitivity to large amount of gains | |||
| • In older adults, outcome valence had no effect on FRN, P3 was insensitive of the complex outcome properties | |||||
| Nashiro et al., 2011 | Behavioral | Exp 1: 18–25 and 62–83 years Exp 2: 18–24 and 69–93 years Exp 3: 18–26 years |
Angry and happy faces as feedback vs. more or less points | Learning and set shifting task | • Older adults made more errors than younger adults in the angry face feedback condition, but no age differences in happy face feedback condition |