Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 26;9:681. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00681

Table 1.

Seven SWATH-MS based benchmark pharmacoproteomic datasets collected for the analysis of this study.

Datasets PRIDE ID Sample size and Dataset description Analysis Chain Instrument
Nat. Biotechnol. PXD002952 3 samples of 65% human, 30% yeast, and 5% E. coli proteins LOG-MED-??? TripleTOF 6600
34:1130-6, 2016 3 samples of 65% human, 15% yeast, and 20% E. coli proteins
Cell Rep. PXD003278 6 siRNA-treated Cal51 cell samples LOG-QUA-NON TripleTOF 5600
20:1229-41, 2017 6 PRPF8-depleted Cal51 cell samples
Cell. PXD006106 10 formaldehyde treated HeLa Kyoto cell samples LOG-MED-NON TripleTOF 5600
169:1105-18, 2017 10 formaldehyde untreated HeLa Kyoto cell samples
Nat Med. PXD000672 18 tumorous kidney tissue biopsies LOG-QUA-NON TripleTOF 5600
21:407-13, 2015 18 non-tumorous kidney tissue biopsies
Sci Rep. PXD004880 18 plasma samples from individuals with Down syndrome LOG-MED-NON TripleTOF 5600
7:14818, 2017 18 plasma samples from healthy controls
Cell Rep. PXD003972 20 wild type mouse samples LOG-???-??? TripleTOF 5600
18:3219-26, 2017 20 knock-in mouse samples expressing endogenous GRB2
Mol Syst. Biol. PXD001064 72 blood samples of monozygotic twins ???-RLR-BAK TripleTOF 5600
11:786, 2015 44 blood samples of dizygotic twins

All datasets were from PRIDE database (Navarro et al., 2016). Each method in the analysis chain was abbreviated by a three-letter code as demonstrated in Supplementary Table S1, and ??? indicated that the corresponding method was not specified in the corresponding study of the dataset.