Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;28(8):3228–3236. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5266-1

Table 2.

Clinicopathological and procedural characteristics of HCC and CRLM according to ablation device

RFA MWA_A MWA_B
HCC CRLM p value HCC CRLM p value HCC CRLM p value
R(AZ:E) (mL/kJ) 0.22 (0.14–0.45) 0.15 (0.14–0.22) 0.110 0.81 (0.61–1.07) 0.43 (0.35–0.61) 0.001 0.67 (0.41–0.85) 0.43 (0.35–0.61) 0.040
Tumor diameter (mm) 23.2 (5.6) 19.4 (8.2) 0.227 27.9 (12.0) 23.7 (13.2) 0.377 23.8 (10.1) 24.5 (9.9) 0.722
Peritumoral vessels >3mm 3 5 0.682 6 9 0.466 7 3 0.245
Ablation time (min) 40 (22) 76 (38.2) 0.007 13 (9) 21 (14) 0.052 24 (11) 25 (15) 0.631
Applied energy (kJ) 222.5 (215.5) 466.7 (300.4) 0.022 98.2 (62.8) 182.4 (140.7) 0.043 127.1 (73.1) 143.7 (87.1) 0.817
Needle positions (n) 3.3 (1.1) 4.2 (2.3) 0.140 4.3 (2.9) 5.2 (3.6) 0.476 3.7 (1.5) 4.0 (2.4) 0.618
Ablation zone volume (mL) 31.6 (13.5–51.7) 54.7 (33.2–67.2) 0.050 69.5 (42.6–96.4) 57.2 (25.8–88.6) 0.548 81.6 (46.6–116.7) 53.3 (21.1–85.6) 0.134
Tumor percent of ablation zone volume 15.8 (8.2–22.8) 5.8 (2.8–8.8) <0.001 18.0 (6.0–30.0) 10.9 (4.4–17.4) 0.178 5.8 (4.6–7.0) 14.9 (13.9–15.9) 0.412
Incomplete after 1 week of follow-up (n) 2 2 1.000 3 4 0.666 1 2 0.543

Normally distributed data are presented as means (SD) and non-normally distributed data as medians (Q1–Q3)

RFA radiofrequency ablation, MWA microwave ablation, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, CRLM colorectal liver metastasis, R(AZ:E) ratio of ablation zone volume to applied energy