Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 12;25(8):2441–2448. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6554-y

Table 2.

Details on treatment regimen and pathological assessment of the resection specimen of 381 patients, divided into the CROSS (n = 208) and post-CROSS (n = 173) cohorts for patients with oesophageal or junctional cancer who underwent chemoradiotherapy according to CROSS followed by surgery

CROSS Post-CROSS
N (%) N (%) p value
Total 208 173
Chemotherapy < 5 cycles 4 (2) 6 (4) 0.348
5 cycles 204 (98) 167 (96)
Radiotherapy < 23 cycles 2 (1) 0 (0) 0.196
23 cycles 206 (99) 173 (100)
Weeks between end of nCRT and surgery Mean [SD] 6.6 [0.1] 7.9 [0.3] < 0.001
≤ 6 95 (46) 48 (28) < 0.0001
> 6 113 (54) 125 (72)
Surgical approach Transthoracic 92 (44) 89 (52) 0.734
Transhiatal 116(56) 56 (33)
Othera 0 (0) 28 (16)
Resection margins R0 195 (94) 159 (92) 0.486
R1 13 (6) 14 (8)
ypT stageb T0 71 (34) 57 (33) 0.65
T1 29 (14) 25 (14)
T2 41 (20) 30 (17)
T3 64 (31) 60 (35)
T4 2 (1) 1 (1)
Missing 1 (0) 0 (0)
ypN stageb N0 144 (69) 108 (62) 0.22
N1 45 (22) 51 (29)
N2 15 (7) 9 (5)
N3 4 (2) 5 (3)
LN ratio Mean [SD] 0.065 [0.142] 0.046 [0.092] < 0.0001
Pathological complete responsec T0N0M0 56 (27) 49 (28) 0.76
Differentiation grade Poor 26 (12) 53 (31) < 0.0001
Moderate 26 (12) 49 (28)
Good 1 (1) 3 (2)
Unknown, including pCR 155 (75) 68 (40)

CROSS ChemoRadiotherapy for Oesophageal cancer followed by Surgery Study, nCRT neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, SD standard deviation, R0 tumor-free resection margin, R1 tumor cells within 1 mm or at the resection margin, ypT stage T stage after nCRT, ypN stage N stage after nCRT, pCR pathologically complete response, LN ratio ratio of positive/resected lymph nodes divided by the number of resected lymph nodes (between 0 and 1)

aOther approaches, including minimally invasive esophagectomy and left thoracoabdominal approach

bPathological T and N stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

cPathologically complete response (ypT0N0M0)