Table 4.
Variables | Year 2010 | Year 2014 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | P | OR | 95% CI | P | |||
Income (ref. the poorest) | ||||||||
Lower 20% | 0.847 | 0.753 | 0.953 | 0.006 | 0.953 | 0.838 | 1.083 | 0.459 |
Medium 20% | 0.734 | 0.649 | 0.830 | < 0.001 | 0.838 | 0.731 | 0.961 | 0.012 |
Higher 20% | 0.630 | 0.554 | 0.716 | < 0.001 | 0.799 | 0.697 | 0.916 | 0.001 |
The richest | 0.555 | 0.484 | 0.636 | < 0.001 | 0.598 | 0.513 | 0.696 | < 0.001 |
Age (ref. 15–30) | ||||||||
30–40 | 2.982 | 2.377 | 3.742 | < 0.001 | 3.538 | 2.624 | 4.771 | < 0.001 |
40–50 | 5.791 | 4.667 | 7.185 | < 0.001 | 6.485 | 4.959 | 8.480 | < 0.001 |
50–60 | 7.883 | 6.358 | 9.774 | < 0.001 | 10.782 | 8.283 | 14.033 | < 0.001 |
> 60 | 10.116 | 8.195 | 12.487 | < 0.001 | 11.968 | 9.320 | 15.368 | < 0.001 |
Gender (ref. female) | ||||||||
Male | 0.813 | 0.746 | 0.886 | < 0.001 | 0.821 | 0.746 | 0.904 | < 0.001 |
Marital status (ref. single) | ||||||||
Married | 0.936 | 0.825 | 1.062 | 0.307 | 0.985 | 0.857 | 1.131 | 0.826 |
Occupation (ref. unemployment) | ||||||||
Agricultural | 0.805 | 0.729 | 0.889 | < 0.001 | 0.655 | 0.580 | 0.740 | < 0.001 |
Self-employed | 0.517 | 0.413 | 0.648 | < 0.001 | 0.509 | 0.416 | 0.622 | < 0.001 |
employees | 0.558 | 0.477 | 0.654 | < 0.001 | 0.544 | 0.464 | 0.637 | < 0.001 |
Education (ref. illiteracy) | ||||||||
up to junior high school | 0.671 | 0.609 | 0.739 | < 0.001 | 0.568 | 0.511 | 0.632 | < 0.001 |
up to vocational school | 0.577 | 0.496 | 0.672 | < 0.001 | 0.423 | 0.355 | 0.504 | < 0.001 |
bachelor degree or above | 0.543 | 0.341 | 0.865 | 0.010 | 0.342 | 0.202 | 0.578 | < 0.001 |
Residence (ref. rural) | ||||||||
urban | 0.820 | 0.749 | 0.899 | < 0.001 | 0.839 | 0.759 | 0.927 | < 0.01 |
Region (ref. west) | ||||||||
Central | 1.010 | 0.903 | 1.129 | 0.868 | 0.892 | 0.789 | 1.008 | 0.068 |
East | 0.961 | 0.865 | 1.067 | 0.455 | 0.931 | 0.831 | 1.043 | 0.217 |
Constant | 0.098 | 0.079 | 0.122 | < 0.001 | 0.090 | 0.070 | 0.116 | < 0.01 |
R2 = 0.136 | R2 = 0.154 |
Note: weighted proportions accounting for sampling design were used. Models in both years controlled for age, gender, marital status, occupation, education, residence and region