Table 11.
Chrom. | HapCHAT | HapCol | WhatsHap | WhatsHap | HapCUT2 | ReFHap | ProbHap | FastHare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cov. 15x | cov. 20x | |||||||
1 | 1.929 | - | 1.926 | 1.924 | 1.920 | - | - | 2.191 |
2 | 0.038 | - | 0.050 | 0.035 | 0.030 | - | - | 0.374 |
3 | 0.044 | - | 0.045 | 0.039 | 0.031 | - | - | 0.381 |
4 | 2.042 | - | 2.052 | 2.048 | 2.033 | - | - | 2.237 |
5 | 1.829 | - | 1.828 | 1.824 | 1.825 | - | - | 1.998 |
6 | 1.991 | - | 1.990 | 1.991 | 1.983 | - | - | 2.205 |
7 | 0.659 | - | 0.669 | 0.666 | 0.660 | - | - | 0.924 |
8 | 1.743 | - | 1.746 | 1.748 | 1.749 | - | - | 1.992 |
9 | 1.966 | - | 1.965 | 1.966 | 1.940 | 2.140 | - | 2.187 |
10 | 0.949 | - | 0.949 | 0.948 | 0.939 | 1.171 | - | 1.232 |
11 | 2.092 | - | 2.101 | 2.101 | 2.081 | 2.282 | - | 2.325 |
12 | 0.041 | - | 0.055 | 0.048 | 0.043 | 0.319 | - | 0.405 |
13 | 0.051 | - | 0.036 | 0.049 | 0.029 | 0.285 | - | 0.349 |
14 | 0.034 | - | 0.042 | 0.039 | 0.032 | 0.347 | - | 0.421 |
15 | 0.055 | 0.331 | 0.069 | 0.065 | 0.043 | 0.358 | - | 0.427 |
16 | 0.022 | 0.289 | 0.022 | 0.029 | 0.027 | 0.322 | - | 0.420 |
17 | 0.055 | 0.277 | 0.071 | 0.067 | 0.047 | 0.337 | - | 0.426 |
18 | 1.895 | - | 1.879 | 1.876 | 1.889 | 2.072 | - | 2.122 |
19 | 2.629 | - | 2.642 | 2.644 | 2.616 | 2.807 | - | 2.914 |
20 | 0.043 | 0.277 | 0.046 | 0.043 | 0.043 | 0.412 | - | 0.451 |
21 | 0.033 | - | 0.044 | 0.041 | 0.030 | 0.364 | - | 0.408 |
22 | 2.102 | 2.323 | 2.106 | 2.114 | 2.068 | 2.378 | - | 2.452 |
Each row corresponds to a chromosome. The dataset consists of all reads aligned to the chromosome. We report the results obtained by running the tools with maximum coverage 30 × for HapCHAT, 25 × for HapCol, 15 × and 20 × for WhatsHap. No maximum coverage was set for HapCUT2, ReFHap, ProbHap, and FastHare. The best result (lowest value) for each dataset is boldfaced