Table 12.
Hamming Distance percentage on datasets of NA12878
Chrom. | HapCHAT | HapCol | WhatsHap | WhatsHap | HapCUT2 | ReFHap | ProbHap | FastHare |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cov. 15x | cov. 20x | |||||||
1 | 2.12 | - | 1.92 | 2.10 | 2.11 | - | - | 6.16 |
2 | 0.51 | - | 0.49 | 0.29 | 0.77 | - | - | 4.91 |
3 | 0.32 | - | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.48 | - | - | 4.74 |
4 | 2.47 | - | 2.15 | 2.18 | 2.00 | - | - | 6.44 |
5 | 2.33 | - | 2.53 | 2.22 | 1.98 | - | - | 6.56 |
6 | 3.39 | - | 3.02 | 3.20 | 2.82 | - | - | 7.15 |
7 | 1.16 | - | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.36 | - | - | 5.05 |
8 | 2.44 | - | 2.46 | 2.54 | 2.02 | - | - | 6.14 |
9 | 2.45 | - | 2.31 | 2.49 | 2.11 | 5.68 | - | 6.23 |
10 | 1.19 | - | 1.16 | 1.18 | 0.93 | 3.89 | - | 5.29 |
11 | 2.08 | - | 2.06 | 2.06 | 1.99 | 4.25 | - | 5.08 |
12 | 0.43 | - | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.51 | 2.92 | - | 5.54 |
13 | 0.41 | - | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.35 | 4.01 | - | 4.84 |
14 | 0.21 | - | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.17 | 3.01 | - | 3.24 |
15 | 0.23 | 3.39 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 4.18 | - | 5.49 |
16 | 0.24 | 2.09 | 0.45 | 0.88 | 0.28 | 1.65 | - | 2.87 |
17 | 0.50 | 2.84 | 0.38 | 0.79 | 0.20 | 2.89 | - | 4.61 |
18 | 1.80 | - | 1.67 | 1.65 | 1.68 | 4.77 | - | 8.10 |
19 | 3.19 | - | 3.14 | 3.40 | 2.99 | 4.37 | - | 7.32 |
20 | 1.37 | 3.47 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 2.99 | - | 4.07 |
21 | 0.10 | - | 0.10 | 0.10 | 1.95 | 5.37 | - | 4.22 |
22 | 1.82 | 4.92 | 1.84 | 1.83 | 1.82 | 4.83 | - | 6.52 |
Each row corresponds to a chromosome. The dataset consists of all reads aligned to the chromosome. We report the results obtained by running the tools with maximum coverage 30 × for HapCHAT, 25 × for HapCol, 15 × and 20 × for WhatsHap. No maximum coverage was set for HapCUT2, ReFHap, ProbHap, and FastHare. The best result (lowest value) for each dataset is boldfaced