Table 2.
Hamming distance on the real Ashkenazim dataset, Chromosome 1
| Avg. | HapCHAT | HapCol | WhatsHap | WhatsHap | HapCUT2 | ReFHap | ProbHap | FastHare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cov. | cov. 15x | cov. 20x | ||||||
| 25 | 0.54 | 2.41 | 0.64 | 0.84 | 0.44 | 3.96 | 3.42 | 5.53 |
| 30 | 0.35 | 2.18 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.24 | 3.46 | 3.41 | 5.38 |
| 35 | 0.36 | 2.02 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 3.99 | - | 5.62 |
| 40 | 0.37 | 1.66 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 3.10 | - | 5.08 |
| 45 | 0.38 | 1.80 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 3.02 | - | 4.49 |
| 50 | 0.41 | 1.47 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 2.84 | - | 4.32 |
| 55 | 0.40 | 0.87 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 3.28 | - | 4.67 |
| 60 | 0.39 | 1.25 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 3.60 | - | 5.06 |
For each dataset, its row identified by its average coverage (Avg. Cov.). We report the results obtained by running the tools with maximum coverage 30 × for HapCHAT, 25 × for HapCol, 15 × and 20 × for WhatsHap. No maximum coverage was set for HapCUT2, ReFHap, ProbHap, and FastHare. The best result (lowest value) for each dataset is boldfaced