Table 7.
Hamming Distance percentage on simulated datasets of Chromosome 1
| Avg. | HapCHAT | HapCol | WhatsHap | WhatsHap | HapCUT2 | ReFHap | ProbHap | FastHare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cov. | cov. 15x | cov. 20x | ||||||
| 25 | 0.35 | 1.30 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 3.43 | 2.66 | 5.95 |
| 30 | 0.33 | 1.92 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.38 | 2.52 | 2.43 | 4.55 |
| 35 | 0.27 | 1.37 | 0.34 | 0.55 | 0.37 | 1.92 | 2.09 | 3.93 |
| 40 | 0.26 | 1.18 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 1.86 | - | 3.31 |
| 45 | 0.34 | 1.02 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 1.95 | - | 3.12 |
| 50 | 0.27 | 1.18 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 1.42 | - | 3.14 |
| 55 | 0.28 | 1.13 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.20 | 1.48 | - | 3.19 |
| 60 | 0.13 | 1.26 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.57 | 1.49 | - | 3.49 |
For each dataset, its row identified by its average coverage (Avg. Cov.). We report the results obtained by running the tools with maximum coverage 30 × for HapCHAT, 25 × for HapCol, 15 × and 20 × for WhatsHap. No maximum coverage was set for HapCUT2, ReFHap, ProbHap, and FastHare. The best result (lowest value) for each dataset is boldfaced