Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 3;15:63. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0407-6

Table 3.

COP sway (mean ± standard error) at baseline and during intervention in the control and nGVS groups and the results of two-way mixed-design ANOVA

Value of COP sway measurement Control group nGVS group
Baseline Stimulation P value Baseline Stimulation P value
 RMS area (mm2) 187.9 ± 17.2 182.2 ± 22.1 0.708 261.1 ± 41.2 244.9 ± 42.8 0.570
 Sway path length (mm) 789.4 ± 65.2 790.3 ± 65.0 0.970 781.7 ± 59.2 714.3 ± 49.8 0.003
 ML mean velocity (mm/s) 16.0 ± 1.3 16.1 ± 1.4 0.801 16.5 ± 1.3 14.9 ± 1.0 0.005
 AP mean velocity (mm/s) 16.7 ± 1.5 16.6 ± 1.4 0.858 16.1 ± 1.5 14.5 ± 1.1 0.007
Two-way mixed-design ANOVA Time Group Time × Group
F value P value F value P value F value P value
 RMS area 0.479 (1,30) 0.494 2.419 (1,30) 0.130 0.111 (1,30) 0.741
 Sway path length 5.232 (1,30) 0.029 0.249 (1,30) 0.622 5.503 (1,30) 0.026
 ML mean velocity 3.882 (1,30) 0.058 0.038 (1,30) 0.847 5.549 (1,30) 0.025
 AP mean velocity 5.457 (1,30) 0.026 0.476 (1,30) 0.496 4.328 (1,30) 0.046

COP sway is reported as mean ± standard error, AP anteroposterior; ANOVA analysis of variance, COP, centre of pressure, ML, mediolateral, nGVS, noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation, RMS root mean square