Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):475–482. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182858673

Table 3.

Relative Odds of Mortality for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) by Hospital Teaching Status, Compared With Nonteaching Hospitals, for Patient Severity Groups, 1997–2002*

Hospital teaching status Low-risk patients Medium-risk patients High-risk patients



Odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Minor teaching 0.91 (0.88–0.94) 0.96 (0.94–0.98) 1.00 (0.98–1.02)

Major teaching 1.01 (0.96–1.07) 1.02 (0.98–1.06) 0.98 (0.94–1.02)
*

Model adjusts for patient age, sex, incidence of previous AMI, number of admissions in prior six months, 27 Elixhauser comorbidities, anatomical location of AMI, and year dummies. This figure is derived from a model in which we estimate odds of mortality for minor and major teaching hospitals (versus nonteaching hospitals), comparing the degree to which mortality differs for patients of different underlying severity. Low-risk patients include deciles 1–3, medium-risk patients include deciles 4–7, and high-risk patients include deciles 8–10.

A hospital’s teaching intensity was determined by its ratio of residents to beds (RB). Minor teaching: 0 < RB < 0.25; major teaching: RB = 0.25.

P < .01.