Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Transplant. 2018 Mar 14;32(4):e13223. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13223

TABLE 3.

Effect of KAS on young pediatric recipients

Odds ratio of DGF (post-KAS vs pre-KAS) 95% CI
Unadjusted (N = 1143) 1.69 (1.07-2.67)
Adjusted (multivariable logistic regression) (N = 1143) 1.75 (1.09-2.82)
Propensity score-matched cohort (N = 708) 1.71 (1.01-2.46)

Odds of DGF post-KAS relative to pre-KAS in the unadjusted sample, adjusted (multivariable logistic regression) model, and nearest-neighbor propensity score-matched cohort. Covariates used for adjustment or matching included recipient age, sex, race, renal diagnosis (congenital/acquired uropathy, FSGS, hypoplasia/dysplasia/dysgenesis/agenesis, other) history of previous transplant and sensitization (end CPRA). See Table S1 for the full multivariable logistic regression model and Table S2 for balancing in propensity score-matched cohort.