Table 10.

Comparisons with other methods on BRATS 2015 testing dataset.

Methods	Dice			Positive Predictive Value			Sensitivity
	Complete	Core	Enhancing	Complete	Core	Enhancing	Complete	Core	Enhancing
DeepMedic + CRF (Kamnitsas et al., 2017)	0.847	0.67	0.629	0.85	0.848	0.634	0.876	0.607	0.662
Our method(axial)	0.80	0.68	0.61	0.82	0.75	0.59	0.81	0.71	0.68
Our method(coronal)	0.80	0.69	0.61	0.77	0.70	0.61	0.87	0.76	0.65
Our method(sagittal)	0.78	0.69	0.57	0.80	0.74	0.51	0.80	0.71	0.72
Our method(fusing)	0.82	0.72	0.62	0.84	0.78	0.60	0.83	0.73	0.69
Our FCNN(axial) + 3D CRF	0.84	0.72	0.62	0.88	0.75	0.62	0.82	0.76	0.67
Our FCNN(coronal) + 3D CRF	0.83	0.72	0.62	0.88	0.75	0.62	0.82	0.75	0.66
Our FCNN(sagittal) + 3D CRF	0.82	0.72	0.60	0.88	0.75	0.59	0.81	0.76	0.67
Our FCNN + 3D CRF (fusing)	0.84	0.73	0.62	0.89	0.76	0.63	0.82	0.76	0.67