Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2017 Oct 5;43:98–111. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2017.10.002

Table 2.

The evaluation results of FCNN + CRF with 5 of 6 post-processing steps (FCNN + CRF + post- x indicates FCNN + CRF with all other post-processing steps except the step x, the sizes of patches used to train FCNNs were 33*33*3 and 65*65*3 respectively, n = 5, and the number of patches used to train FCNNs was 5000*5*20.).

Dataset Methods Dice PPV Sensitivity



Complete Core Enhancing Complete Core Enhancing Complete Core Enhancing
Challenge FCNN + CRF + post-process 0.87 0.83 0.76 0.92 0.87 0.77 0.83 0.81 0.77
FCNN + CRF + post-1 0.87 0.83 0.76 0.92 0.87 0.77 0.83 0.81 0.77
FCNN + CRF + post-2 0.86 0.83 0.76 0.90 0.87 0.77 0.84 0.81 0.77
FCNN + CRF + post-3 0.85 0.80 0.72 0.88 0.80 0.69 0.83 0.81 0.77
FCNN + CRF + post-4 0.86 0.82 0.76 0.92 0.88 0.77 0.82 0.78 0.77
FCNN + CRF + post-5 0.87 0.83 0.74 0.92 0.87 0.70 0.83 0.81 0.79
FCNN + CRF + post-6 0.87 0.83 0.76 0.92 0.87 0.77 0.83 0.81 0.77
Leaderboard FCNN + CRF + post-process 0.86 0.73 0.62 0.89 0.76 0.64 0.84 0.78 0.68
FCNN + CRF + post-1 0.84 0.71 0.62 0.88 0.75 0.64 0.82 0.77 0.68
FCNN + CRF + post-2 0.86 0.73 0.62 0.88 0.76 0.64 0.86 0.77 0.68
FCNN + CRF + post-3 0.85 0.70 0.59 0.87 0.73 0.57 0.84 0.75 0.68
FCNN + CRF + post-4 0.85 0.71 0.62 0.89 0.77 0.64 0.82 0.74 0.68
FCNN + CRF + post-5 0.86 0.72 0.59 0.89 0.76 0.57 0.84 0.76 0.71
FCNN + CRF + post-6 0.86 0.70 0.62 0.89 0.76 0.64 0.84 0.71 0.68