Table 2.
The evaluation results of FCNN + CRF with 5 of 6 post-processing steps (FCNN + CRF + post- x indicates FCNN + CRF with all other post-processing steps except the step x, the sizes of patches used to train FCNNs were 33*33*3 and 65*65*3 respectively, n = 5, and the number of patches used to train FCNNs was 5000*5*20.).
| Dataset | Methods | Dice | PPV | Sensitivity | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
| Complete | Core | Enhancing | Complete | Core | Enhancing | Complete | Core | Enhancing | ||
| Challenge | FCNN + CRF + post-process | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| FCNN + CRF + post-1 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.77 | |
| FCNN + CRF + post-2 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.77 | |
| FCNN + CRF + post-3 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.77 | |
| FCNN + CRF + post-4 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.77 | |
| FCNN + CRF + post-5 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.79 | |
| FCNN + CRF + post-6 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.77 | |
| Leaderboard | FCNN + CRF + post-process | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.68 |
| FCNN + CRF + post-1 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.68 | |
| FCNN + CRF + post-2 | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.68 | |
| FCNN + CRF + post-3 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.59 | 0.87 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.68 | |
| FCNN + CRF + post-4 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.68 | |
| FCNN + CRF + post-5 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.71 | |
| FCNN + CRF + post-6 | 0.86 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.64 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.68 | |