Table 8.

Comparisons with other methods on BRATS 2013 dataset.

Dataset	Methods	Dice			Positive Predictive Value			Sensitivity
		Complete	Core	Enhancing	Complete	Core	Enhancing	Complete	Core	Enhancing
Challenge	Nick Tustison	0.87	0.78	0.74	0.85	0.74	0.69	0.89	0.88	0.83
	Raphael Meier	0.82	0.73	0.69	0.76	0.78	0.71	0.92	0.72	0.73
	Syed Reza	0.83	0.72	0.72	0.82	0.81	0.70	0.86	0.69	0.76
	Havaei et al. (2017)	0.88	0.79	0.73	0.89	0.79	0.68	0.87	0.79	0.80
	Pereira et al. (2016)	0.88	0.83	0.77	0.88	0.87	0.74	0.89	0.83	0.81
	Our method(axial)	0.87	0.83	0.76	0.92	0.87	0.77	0.83	0.81	0.77
	Our method(coronal)	0.87	0.82	0.76	0.86	0.83	0.74	0.89	0.83	0.79
	Our method(sagittal)	0.87	0.82	0.77	0.88	0.83	0.75	0.86	0.82	0.79
	Our method(fusing)	0.88	0.84	0.77	0.90	0.87	0.76	0.86	0.82	0.80
Leaderboard	Nick Tustison	0.79	0.65	0.53	0.83	0.70	0.51	0.81	0.73	0.66
	Liang Zhao	0.79	0.59	0.47	0.77	0.55	0.50	0.85	0.77	0.53
	Raphael Meier	0.72	0.60	0.53	0.65	0.62	0.48	0.88	0.69	0.64
	Havaei et al. (2017)	0.84	0.71	0.57	0.88	0.79	0.54	0.84	0.72	0.68
	Pereira et al. (2016)	0.84	0.72	0.62	0.85	0.82	0.60	0.86	0.76	0.68
	Our method(axial)	0.86	0.73	0.62	0.89	0.76	0.64	0.84	0.78	0.68
	Our method(coronal)	0.86	0.73	0.62	0.86	0.73	0.60	0.89	0.79	0.67
	Our method(sagittal)	0.84	0.71	0.60	0.85	0.74	0.59	0.84	0.74	0.67
	Our method(fusing)	0.86	0.73	0.62	0.89	0.77	0.60	0.85	0.77	0.69