Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 12.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Cell Biol. 2018 Mar 12;20(4):432–442. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0056-9

Figure 1. Hos3 delays Start in daughter cells.

Figure 1

(A) Scheme showing the separation of G1 in two distinct periods, T1 and T2, relative to Myo1 and Whi5 dynamics. The disappearance of Myo1-GFP from the bud neck marked cytokinesis; its reappearance to the new bud site marked budding. (B) Composite of phase contrast, Whi5-GFP and Myo1-GFP in wild type (WT) and hos3Δ cells. Daughter hos3Δ cells start a new bud (Myo1-GFP appearance, arrows) earlier than WT. Confocal sections spanning the entire cell were acquired at 3-minute intervals. Time is indicated in minutes; t=0 marks the last frame before cytokinesis. Scale bars, 2 μm. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results. (C-G) αTG1 values (mean and SEM) (C) and correlation between αT1 (with binned means and SEM) and cell size at the time of birth (cytokinesis) (D-G), for mother and daughter cell pairs. (H) αT1 values (mean and SEM) are shown in cells of the indicated strains. Sample size: WT (n=110 cells), hos3Δ (n=128 cells) and hos3EN (n=66 cells) pooled from three independent experiments. In panels C and H, two-sided Mann-Whitney test were used. *** denotes p < 0.0001; ns, non-significant, p > 0.05. Exact p values: 8.93x10-5 (Figure 1C, WT vs. hos3Δ), 7.20x10-7 (1H, WT vs. hos3Δ), 5.69x10-4 (1H, WT vs. hos3EN).