Skip to main content
. 2018 May 26;109(7):2266–2274. doi: 10.1111/cas.13627

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival

Characteristic Training set Validation set Combined set
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P‐value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P‐value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P‐value
Univariate
Age at surgery, years: >60 vs <60 1.349(0.814‐2.235) .248 1.118(0.660‐1.895) .679 1.225(0.851‐1764) .278
Gender: male vs female 0.638(0.381‐1.070) .089 0.821(0.472‐1.427) .486 0.726(0.498‐1.057) .097
Tumor location: bile duct vs gallbladder 0.621(0.407‐0.948) .028 0.917(0.550‐1.528) .739 0.752(0.545‐1.036) .081
TNM stage: III + IV vs I + II 4.232(2.148‐8.336) <.001 1.945(1.481‐2.555) <.001 1.976(1.584‐2.463) <.001
Differentiation: poor vs well‐moderate 0.892(0.683‐1.165) .405 1.352(1.032‐1.770) .029 1.074(0.895‐1.290) .444
Surgical margin: positive vs negative 1.679(0.800‐3.538) .173 1.907(0.902‐4.032) .093 1.750(1.031‐2.970) .038
Microvascular invasion: present vs absent 1.571(0.948‐2.605) .081 1.646(0.968‐2.800) .067 1.610(1.118‐2.320) .011
CD66b expression: high vs low 4.720(2.623‐8.493) <.001 4.993(2.626‐9.492) <.001 4.688(3.050‐7.206) <.001
Multivariate
Tumor location: bile duct vs gallbladder 0.869(0.522‐1.447) .591
TNM stage: III + IV vs I + II 3.253(1.537‐6.885) <.001 1.588(1.193‐2.113) <.001 1.640(1.311‐2.051) <.001
Differentiation: poor vs well‐moderate 1.252(0.948‐1.653) .115
Surgical margin: positive vs negative 1.446(0.821‐2.545) .204
Microvascular invasion: present vs absent 1.319(0.892‐1.949) .167
CD66b expression: high vs low 4.213(2.320‐7.650) <.001 4.010(2.217‐7.253) <.001 4.133(2.660‐6.423) <.001

< .05 is considered statistically significant (bold).

Combined set was generated by combing the training and validation sets together (bold).