Table 1.
Animal model | Advantages | Drawbacks |
---|---|---|
Cell‐line‐based xenografts |
Easy to perform, especially when s.c. inoculated Short experiment duration Comparison with in vitro results is intuitive |
Often lacks stroma Immunological involvement is difficult to assess because of use of immunodeficient mice Cell lines may not faithfully represent cancer cell population found in human primary tumors |
Genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM) |
Recapitulates human histopathology well Well characterized and reproducible |
Expensive Time‐consuming |
Patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) models |
Recapitulates human histopathology well Patient‐specific mechanisms may be addressed |
Engraftment efficiency is not high and may select for aggressive tumors Labor intensive Expensive Reproducibility may become a concern as a result of patient specificity |