Table 3.
Population Aged≥55 Yrs
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Study Site | N* | Age (Yrs) | Female Gender | Education Level |
Shunyi | 1098 | 1.18 (1.11–1.25) P < 0.001 | 1.16 (0.68–2.00) P = 0.521 | 0.71 (0.53-0.95) P = 0.029 |
Guangzhou | 714 | 1.16 (1.13–1.20) P < 0.001 | 1.57 (0.92–2.69) P = 0.091 | 0.66 (0.50–0.87) P = 0.008 |
Kaski | 867 | 1.16 (1.14–1.18) P < 0.001 | 1.20 (0.79–1.85) P = 0.373 | 0.77 (0.63–0.95) P = 0.019 |
Madurai | 937 | 1.05 (1.02–1.08) P = 0.003 | 1.07 (0.74–1.53) P = 0.724 | 0.76 (0.63–0.92) P = 0.007 |
Durban | 503 | 1.08 (1.04–1.12) P < 0.001 | 1.42 (0.62–3.22) P = 0.387 | 0.75 (0.53–1.04) P = 0.084 |
Dosso | 523 | 1.13 (1.09–1.16) P < 0.001 | 1.68 (1.01–2.79) P = 0.045 | 0.89 (0.68–1.15) P = 0.352 |
Los Angeles | 247 | 1.13 (1.01–1.28) P = 0.044 | 0.57 (0.20–1.60) P = 0.203 | 1.25 (0.34–4.50) P = 0.660 |
All Sites† | 4889 | 1.13 (1.12–1.14) P < 0.001 | 1.23 (1.03–1.46) P = 0.020 | 0.70 (0.64–0.76) P < 0.001 |
Data are given as ORs (95% CI). Bold values indicate a significant difference at the P < 0.050 level.
Number of participants included in the multiple logistic regression (corresponding to the number with education data).
Site was included as a covariate in the multiple logistic regression with data from all 7 study sites.