Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2013 Aug 30;121(1):417–422. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.051

Table 3.

Association of Age, Gender, and Education with Near Vision Impairment Not Correctable with Refraction (Uncorrectable Near Vision Impairment) for People Aged ≥55 Years

Population Aged≥55 Yrs
Study Site N* Age (Yrs) Female Gender Education Level
Shunyi 1098 1.18 (1.11–1.25) P < 0.001 1.16 (0.68–2.00) P = 0.521 0.71 (0.53-0.95) P = 0.029
Guangzhou   714 1.16 (1.13–1.20) P < 0.001 1.57 (0.92–2.69) P = 0.091 0.66 (0.50–0.87) P = 0.008
Kaski   867 1.16 (1.14–1.18) P < 0.001 1.20 (0.79–1.85) P = 0.373 0.77 (0.63–0.95) P = 0.019
Madurai   937 1.05 (1.02–1.08) P = 0.003 1.07 (0.74–1.53) P = 0.724 0.76 (0.63–0.92) P = 0.007
Durban   503 1.08 (1.04–1.12) P < 0.001 1.42 (0.62–3.22) P = 0.387 0.75 (0.53–1.04) P = 0.084
Dosso   523 1.13 (1.09–1.16) P < 0.001 1.68 (1.01–2.79) P = 0.045 0.89 (0.68–1.15) P = 0.352
Los Angeles   247 1.13 (1.01–1.28) P = 0.044 0.57 (0.20–1.60) P = 0.203 1.25 (0.34–4.50) P = 0.660
All Sites 4889 1.13 (1.12–1.14) P < 0.001 1.23 (1.03–1.46) P = 0.020 0.70 (0.64–0.76) P < 0.001

Data are given as ORs (95% CI). Bold values indicate a significant difference at the P < 0.050 level.

*

Number of participants included in the multiple logistic regression (corresponding to the number with education data).

Site was included as a covariate in the multiple logistic regression with data from all 7 study sites.