Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 2;185:81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.10.016

TABLE 5.

Changes in the Prevalence of Presenting Vision Impairment (<20/63 to 20/400) and Blindness (<20/400) Between the 2006 and 2014 Surveys

Presenting Visual Acuity

Prevalence (95% Confidence Interval) Prevalence Changea


Degree of Impairment, by Site 2006 Survey Actual 2006 Survey Standardizedb 2014 Survey Actual % Actual Change % Standardized Change
Beijing
 <20/63 to 20/400 8.32 (6.99, 9.66) 7.95 (7.21,8.68) 6.05 (5.35, 6.74) −27.3%* −23.9%*
 <20/400 1.25 (0.80, 1.70) 1.15 (0.87, 1.42) 0.66 (0.48, 0.84) −47.2% −42.6%*
Jiangsu
 <20/63 to 20/400 6.89 (6.03, 7.74) 8.15 (7.34,8.96) 9.94 (8.78, 11.1) +44.3%* +22.0%
 <20/400 2.20 (1.59, 2.81) 2.59 (2.10,3.08) 1.27 (0.90, 1.64) −42.3% −51.0%*
Guangdong
 <20/63 to 20/400 18.2 (16.7, 19.6) 19.8 (18.6, 20.9) 15.3 (14.3, 16.2) −15.9%* −22.7%*
 <20/400 2.68 (2.18, 3.18) 2.79 (2.30, 3.29) 1.76 (1.26, 2.25) −34.3% −36.9%*
Heilongjiang
 <20/63 to 20/400 7.23 (6.00, 8.47) 7.95 (7.13,8.76) 7.88 (6.99, 8.77) +8.99% −0.88%
 <20/400 1.90 (1.44, 2.36) 1.86 (1.46, 2.26) 1.39 (1.14, 1.65) −26.8% −25.3%
Jiangxi
 <20/63 to 20/400 14.5 (13.2, 15.8) 17.2 (16.1, 18.2) 11.6 (10.5, 12.7) −20.0%* −32.6%*
 <20/400 1.88 (1.67, 2.19) 2.27 (1.82,2.71) 1.23 (0.87, 1.60) −34.6%* −45.8%*
Hebei
 <20/63 to 20/400 7.94 (7.10, 8.77) 8.89 (8.07,9.71) 8.29 (7.22, 9.37) +4.41% −6.75%
 <20/400 1.48 (1.09, 1.88) 1.65 (1.26,2.04) 0.70 (0.52, 0.88) −52.7%* −57.6%*
Chongqing
 <20/63 to 20/400 10.7 (9.62, 11.8) 12.4 (11.5, 13.4) 9.91 (8.07, 11.8) −7.38% −20.1%
 <20/400 2.49 (1.97, 3.00) 3.03 (2.53, 3.53) 1.46 (1.06, 1.86) −41.4%* −51.8%*
Yunnan
 <20/63 to 20/400 15.8 (14.6, 17.1) 17.2 (16.1, 18.2) 14.7 (13.2, 16.2) −6.96% −14.5%
 <20/400 5.40 (4.20, 6.60) 6.61 (5.92, 7.31) 5.35 (4.49, 6.20) −0.93% −19.1%
All study sites
 <20/63 to 20/400 11.1 (10.5, 11.7) 12.4 (12.1, 12.8) 10.4 (9.94, 10.9) −6.31% −16.1%*
 <20/400 2.41 (2.18, 2.64) 2.76 (2.60,2.93) 1.71 (1.52, 1.90) −29.0%* −38.0%*

Change in prevalence was calculated as a proportional percentage of the 2006 (actual) prevalence rate and as a proportional percentage of the 2006 prevalence rate after age and sex standardization to the 2014 population.

a

The change in prevalence was considered statistically significant at the P < .05 level, indicated by an asterisk (*), if 95% confidence intervals for the 2006 and 2014 prevalence rates did not overlap.

b

Prevalence in 2006 projected to an age- and sex-standardized 2014 population.