Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2015 Aug 13;122(9):1924–1931. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.034

Table 3.

Prevalence of Unilateral and Bilateral Amblyopia by Potential Causes

Amblyopia Type African
(n = 4234)
Nepali
(n = 4802)
Malay
(n = 3250)
Indian
(n = 10 770)
Chinese
(n = 11 002)
Hispanic
(n = 5263)
All
(n = 39 321)
Unilateral 10 (0.24%) 16 (0.33%) 13 (0.40%) 56 (0.52%) 85 (0.77%) 66 (1.25%) 246 (0.63%)
 Anisometropic* 3 (0.07%) 12 (0.25%) 7 (0.22%) 29 (0.27%) 60 (0.55%) 37 (0.70%) 148 (0.38%)
 Strabismic* 4 (0.09%) 4 (0.08%) 4 (0.12%) 18 (0.17%) 10 (0.09%) 16 (0.30%) 56 (0.14%)
 Mixed strabismic-anisometropic* 1 (0.02%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (0.06%) 7 (0.07%) 7 (0.06%) 10 (0.19%) 27 (0.07%)
 Hyperopia only 2 (0.05%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (0.02%) 8 (0.07%) 3 (0.06%) 15 (0.04%)
Bilateral 2 (0.05%) 1 (0.02%) 4 (0.12%) 11 (0.10%) 17 (0.15%) 9 (0.17%) 44 (0.11%)
Total 12 (0.28%) 17 (0.35%) 17 (0.52%) 67 (0.62%) 102 (0.93%) 75 (1.43%) 290 (0.74%)

Data are presented as number (%) of children with amblyopia.

*

Cases with coexisting hyperopia were included in these categories.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure