Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 3;8:10069. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28168-5

Table 1.

Effect of alignment reference on read quantification.

Alignment reference Condition Total aligned reads (x 1000) Quantified reads (x1000) # of Unique
miRNA quantitated
a. RefSeq quantitation
Whole Genome NSC 3,482 ± 434 2,735 ± 320 1776
sip63 2,979 ± 487 2,328 ± 406 1816
RefSeq NSC 2,681 ± 292 2,681 ± 292 1874
sip63 2,295 ± 398 2,295 ± 398 1873
miRBase NSC 676 ± 113 676 ± 116 1802
sip63 526 ± 138 526 ± 138 1806
b. miRBase quantitation
Whole Genome NSC 3,482 ± 434 1,039 ± 59 1327
sip63 2,979 ± 487 661 ± 124 1309
RefSeq NSC 2,681 ± 292 1,080 ± 59 2241
sip63 2,295 ± 398 705 ± 130 2276
miRBase NSC 676 ± 116 676 ± 116 2582
sip63 526 ± 138 526 ± 138 2586

Raw reads from NSC or sip63 samples trimmed to a fixed length based on quality score were aligned to the whole genome, RefSeq, or miRBase references and quantitated using either (a) RefSeq or (b) miRBase reference. The total number of aligned reads indicate the total number available for quantitation. The number of quantified and unique reads obtained using each of these methods is also indicated.