Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;5(6):180205. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180205

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Mean predicted bat activity (number of bat passes) back-transformed across all sites (n = 21) for each lighting level for (a) Pipistrellus pipistrellus and (b) Myotis spp. (c) Mean predicted insect counts back-transformed across selected sites (n = 7) for each lighting level. (d) Mean predicted buzz ratios back-transformed across all sites (n = 21) for each lighting level. For all graphs letters identify groups that were significantly different from each other and vertical lines denote 95% confidence intervals (CIs).