Table 2.
Trait | Interaction terms of the models | Asphodelus ramosus | Echium plantagineum | Ballota acetabulosa | Teucrium divaricatum | Species combined | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t | p | t | p | t | p | t | p | t | p | ||
Nectar volume per flower | Time × group | 3.119 | ** | −4.900 | *** | −0.757 | 0.481 | −0.362 | |||
Time2 × group | 0.968 | 4.881 | *** | 3.543 | *** | −2.540 | * | 3.715 | *** | ||
Sugar concentration per flower | Time × group | −1.667 | 1.611 | 0.310 | −0.606 | 2.334 | * | ||||
Time2 × group | −0.501 | −0.458 | −1.841 | 1.868 | |||||||
Sugar content per flower | Time × group | 3.529 | ** | −4.988 | *** | 0.554 | 1.058 | 2.012 | * | ||
Time2 × group | 1.417 | 5.786 | *** | 3.880 | ** | −0.997 | 4.225 | *** | |||
Sugar content per plant | Time × group | 2.376 | * | −4.030 | *** | −1.209 | −1.041 | 0.349 | |||
Time2 × group | 1.008 | 4.695 | *** | 3.007 | ** | −0.066 | 2.644 | ** | |||
Number of flowers per plant | Time × group | 0.368 | −2.075 | * | −3.824 | *** | −0.418 | −0.059 | |||
Time2 × group | −0.823 | 2.182 | * | 1.027 | 2.679 | ** | 1.312 |
Only interaction terms are presented here from the model full results and only for the best models (with or without the quadratic effect), according to model AIC values. The analysis with the four species combined is given at the right column in bold.
0.05–0.01,
0.01–0.001,
<0.001.