Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 27;9:874. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00874

Table 2.

Difference in the effect of time (simple and quadratic effect, “time” and “time2”) on nectar traits and the number of flowers between the experimental and control groups (“group”) in the four species for with reliable control data.

Trait Interaction terms of the models Asphodelus ramosus Echium plantagineum Ballota acetabulosa Teucrium divaricatum Species combined
t p t p t p t p t p
Nectar volume per flower Time × group 3.119 ** −4.900 *** −0.757 0.481 0.362
Time2 × group 0.968 4.881 *** 3.543 *** −2.540 * 3.715 ***
Sugar concentration per flower Time × group −1.667 1.611 0.310 −0.606 2.334 *
Time2 × group −0.501 −0.458 −1.841 1.868
Sugar content per flower Time × group 3.529 ** −4.988 *** 0.554 1.058 2.012 *
Time2 × group 1.417 5.786 *** 3.880 ** −0.997 4.225 ***
Sugar content per plant Time × group 2.376 * −4.030 *** −1.209 −1.041 0.349
Time2 × group 1.008 4.695 *** 3.007 ** −0.066 2.644 **
Number of flowers per plant Time × group 0.368 −2.075 * −3.824 *** −0.418 0.059
Time2 × group −0.823 2.182 * 1.027 2.679 ** 1.312

Only interaction terms are presented here from the model full results and only for the best models (with or without the quadratic effect), according to model AIC values. The analysis with the four species combined is given at the right column in bold.

*

0.05–0.01,

**

0.01–0.001,

***

<0.001.