Skip to main content
. 2018 May 15;19:507–515. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.015

Table 3.

Task-state and resting-state stationary and dynamic functional connectivity.

pwMS (n = 29) HCs (n = 18) Effect size (η2) p p corr.
Average head motion
 Resting-state (mm) 0.068 (0.035) 0.068 (0.028) < 0.001 0.989 0.989
 Task-state (mm) 0.091 (0.042) 0.068 (0.036) 0.075 0.063 0.167
Resting-state
 sFC DMN 0.959 (0.051) 0.952 (0.052) 0.005 0.647 0.989
 dFC DMN 1.018 (0.030) 1.019 (0.024) < 0.001 0.8933 0.989
Task-state
 sFC DMN 0.940 (0.048) 0.935 (0.040) < 0.001 0.957 0.989
 dFC DMN 1.034 (0.024) 1.049 (0.027) 0.035 0.213 0.167
Difference
 Task-state minus resting-state
 ΔsFC-DMN −0.019 (0.060) −0.017 (0.068) < 0.001 0.917 0.989
 ΔdFC-DMN 0.016 (0.023) 0.029 (0.044) 0.042 0.168 0.167

Displayed data are mean (standard deviation).

dFC = dynamic functional connectivity; DMN = default mode network; HCs = healthy controls; p corr. = false discovery rate corrected p-values; pwMS = people with multiple sclerosis; sFC = stationary functional connectivity.