Table 2.
Expanded Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale | |||
Intra-Rater Reliability: ICC = 0.959 (95% CI: 0.942–0.971;n = 125) | |||
Inter-Rater Reliability | Trainers | Evaluators | Evaluators vs. gold standard |
Initial reliability North America | ICC = 0.997; | ICC = 0.994 | r = 0.994 – 1.000 |
95% CI:0.988–1.000 | 95% CI: 0.979–1.000 | ||
N = 7 | n = 23 | n = 23 | |
Initial reliability Asia Pacific | ICC = 0.987 | r = 0.996 – 1.000 | |
95% CI: 0.948–1.000 | |||
n = 12 | n = 12 | ||
Initial reliability | ICC = 0.991 | r = 0.987 – 1.000 | |
Europe | 95% CI: 0.966–1.000 | ||
n = 17 | n = 17 | ||
Retraining | ICC = 0.995 | ICC = 0.993 | r = 0.986 – 1.000 |
North America | 95% CI:0.976–1.000 | 95% CI: 0.974–1.000 | |
n = 5 | n = 22 | n = 22 | |
Retraining | ICC = 0.991 | r = 0.997 – 1.000 | |
Europe | 95% CI:0.965–1.000 | ||
n = 12 | n = 12 | ||
Retraining | ICC = 0.996 | r = 0.999 – 1.000 | |
Australia | 95% CI:0.981–1.000 | ||
n = 7 | n = 7 | ||
Retraining | ICC = 0.981 | r = 0.997 – 1.000 | |
Japan | 95% CI:0.921–1.000 | ||
n = 9 | n = 9 |
ICC = Intracalss correlation coefficient; r = Pearson correlation coefficient.