Table 3.
Revised Upper Limb Module | |||
Intra-Rater Reliability: ICC = 0.948 (95% CI: 0.927–0.963;n = 126) | |||
Inter-Rater Reliability | Trainers | Evaluators | Evaluators vs. gold standard |
Initial reliability | ICC = 0.994 | ICC = 0.990 | r = 0.994 – 1.000 |
North America | 95% CI: 0.975–1.000 | 95% CI: 0.961–1.000 | |
n = 7 | n = 25 | n = 25 | |
Initial reliability | ICC = 0.977 | r = 0.979 – 1.000 | |
Asia Pacific | 95% CI: 0.910–0.999 | ||
n = 12 | n = 12 | ||
Initial reliability | ICC = 0.966 | r = 0.895 – 1.000 | |
Europe | 95% CI: 0.877–0.999 | ||
n = 17 | n = 17 | ||
Retraining | ICC = 0.985 | ICC = 0.973 | r = 0.988 – 1.000 |
North America | 95% CI:0.928–1.000 | 95% CI: 0.901–0.999 | |
n = 5 | n = 22 | n = 22 | |
Retraining | ICC = 0.982 | r = 0.994 – 1.000 | |
Australia | 95% CI: 0.920–1.000 | ||
n = 6 | n = 6 | ||
Retraining | ICC = 0.979 | r = 0.986 – 0.999 | |
Japan/Asia Pacific | 95% CI: 0.914–0.999 | ||
n = 8 | n = 8 | ||
Retraining | ICC = 0.982 | r = 0.971 – 1.000 | |
Europe | 95% CI: 0.930–1.000 | ||
n = 14 | n = 14 |
ICC = Intraclass correlation coefficient; r = Pearson correlation coefficient.