Skip to main content
. 2018 May 16;46(Web Server issue):W95–W101. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky418

Table 1. Comparison of tools for automated CAZyme annotation.

Accuracy (F-score)
Tools + databases Bacteria Eukaryotes Subfamily Multi-family proteins Domain repeats Domain positions Speedc
HMMER+dbCAN 0.88 0.86 Yesa Yes Yes Yes 69
DIAMOND+CAZy 0.89 0.84 Yesa No No No 4
Hotpep+PPR 0.80 0.94 Yesb Yes No No 7
Predicted by > = 2 tools 0.93 0.92

aTwenty four CAZyme families are classified into 207 subfamilies by phylogenetic clustering and CAZy expert curation (10).

bThree hundred and forty two CAZyme families are classified into 7036 groups by PPR (15,16).

cThe time is in seconds and calculated on Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 proteome (4140 proteins). The detailed calculations on accuracy and speed are available in Supplementary Table S1. No correspondence has been established between PPR groups and CAZy subfamilies, and in dbCAN web server we only report CAZy subfamily annotation, whenever it is available.