Table 2. Experimental validation of CalFitter web server. Discrepancies are given in terms of absolute % difference for parameters obtained for energies and temperatures.
| Temperature variables (Tm, Tf) | Energy variables (Ea, ΔH, ΔHvh) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data type | Software used for comparison | Number of datasets | Average discrepancy | Maximal discrepancy | Average discrepancy | Maximal discrepancy |
| DSCa | MicroCal DSC Origin | 67 | 0.06% | 0.42% | 3.03% | 15.06% |
| Matlab-based CalFitter 1 | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.07% | ||
| CDb | CD-pal | 44 | 0.01% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 1.18% |
| T-jumpsc | KinTek Explorer | 35 | 0.09% | 0.21% | 6.74% | 10.87% |
abased on ΔH, ΔHvh, and Tm from a non-two state model with ΔHvh.
bbased on Tm and ΔH for a one-step fully reversible model.
cdata from global fitting based on Ea and Ta for a two-step fully irreversible model.