Skip to main content
. 2018 May 8;46(Web Server issue):W84–W88. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky350

Table 2. Comparison of PANNZER2, using the ARGOT scoring function, ARGOT2 and eggNOG-mapper. Tests were repeated by a) omitting annotations with IEA, ISS and ND evidence codes and b) using all GO annotations. Evaluation was repeated using 5000 query subsets of the test data to allow for comparison with ARGOT2. We show results with Fmax and with Smin. Note that higher values of Fmax and lower values of Smin show better performance. PANNZER2 outperforms both eggNOG-mapper and ARGOT2 methods consistently.

Comparisons with the whole dataset Comparisons with subsets of the data
Truth Set = > No IEA, ISS, ND All evidence codes No IEA, ISS, ND All evidence codes
Ontology Metric PANZ2 eggNOG PANZ2 eggNOG PANZ2 eggNOG ARGOT2 PANZ2 eggNOG ARGOT2
BP Fmax 0.699 0.615 0.786 0.640 0.700 0.613 0.608 0.784 0.629 0.682
MF Fmax 0.708 0.640 0.867 0.591 0.708 0.641 0.649 0.858 0.591 0.777
CC Fmax 0.823 0.752 0.863 0.774 0.820 0.749 0.757 0.853 0.773 0.776
BP Smin 31.401 45.918 27.643 45.376 30.264 45.920 38.375 27.474 46.408 42.483
MF Smin 9.597 12.942 6.701 15.995 9.682 12.890 11.609 7.196 16.06 11.946
CC Smin 9.415 14.053 7.917 14.114 9.645 14.184 13.418 8.692 14.401 15.587