Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 4.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012 Dec;77(6):871–876. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04442.x

Table 1.

Comparison of patient demographics, tumour size and baseline biochemical evaluation of thyroid function in adenomas according to type

P-value
All adenomas (n = 149) ACTH adenomas (n = 34) Non-ACTH adenomas (n = 115) PRLomas (n = 72) NFAs (n = 43) ACTH vs Non-ACTH PRL vs NFA
No. female/male (%) 120/26 (81/19) 33/1 (97/3) 87/25 (76/24) 59/13 (82/18) 28/12 (65/35) 0·009 0·16
Mean age (years) 35·6 ± 1·2 38·4 ± 2·2 34·8 ± 1·3 33·7 ± 1·4 36·5 ± 2·6 0·18 0·30
Maximal tumour diameter (mm) 5·26 ± 0·18 (n = 123) 5·82 ± 0·39 (n = 28) 5·11 ± 0·20 (n = 95) 5·18 ± 0·24 (n = 62) 4·98 ± 0·33 (n = 33) 0·09 0·63
Normalized free T4 1·45 ± 0·02 (n = 149) 1·29 ± 0·06 (n = 34) 1·50 ± 0·23 (n = 115) 1·52 ± 0·03 (n = 72) 1·47 ± 0·04 (n = 43) 0·0001 0·30
Normalized TSH 0·46 ± 0·02 (n = 145) 0·42 ± 0·06 (n = 34) 0·47 ± 0·03 (n = 111) 0·46 ± 0·03 (n = 71) 0·50 ± 0·04 (n = 40) 0·36 0·47

PRLomas, prolactinomas; NFA, nonfunctioning adenomas. Bold font indicates statistically significant P-values.