Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 28;48(3):174–181. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2018.48.3.174

Table 5. Comparison of mean graft height change according to tooth type.

Group 3 mon 6 mon 1 yr 2 yr 3 yr
First premolar (n=3) −1.52±2.84 −3.45±2.30a) −2.67±2.30a) −3.27±1.03a) −3.64±3.18a)
Second premolar (n=10) 0.14±3.32 −0.37±3.45a) −0.56±2.87a) −0.89±3.25a) −1.72±1.20a)
First molar (n=20) −0.47±3.93 −1.12±3.97a) −1.50±3.68a) −2.37±2.93a) −2.37±2.93a)
Second molar (n=6) −1.27±3.09 −1.29±2.18a) −1.55±2.59a) −2.06±2.11a) −1.93±1.78a)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation (mm).

ANOVA: analysis of variance.

a)Statistically significant decrease in height compared to baseline (P<0.05) by 1-way ANOVA; No statistically significant difference in graft height change was detected among different tooth types (P>0.05) by ANOVA for repeated measures.