Table 1.
Study | Country | Study Design | Total Number of Patients | Median Age | Median Follow-up Time (Month) | Treatment Arms | HR (OS) | P value (OS) | HR (DFS) | P value (DFS) | Study Qulatiy Score | Conclusion | REF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carey L,2012 | USA | Prospective Phase 2 | 102 71 |
52(28-83) | 26 | Cetuximab Cetuximab+Carboplatin |
0.381 | 0.354 | 4 | NS | 13 | ||
Fan Y,2012 | China | Prospective Phase 2 | 53 27 |
48(32-67) | 24 | Dosetaksel+Cisplatin Dosetaksel+Capesitabine | 0.41 | 0.027 | 0.029 | <0,001 | 3 | S | 11 |
Khalaf D,2013 | Canada | Retrospective | 58 | 48.9 | NR | Various platin based regime | 0.97 | NR | 5 | NS | 17 | ||
Garza CV, 2013 | Canada | Retrospective | 153 58 |
53.2 | NR | Various platin based regime | 0.57 | 0.002 | 5 | S | 14 | ||
Hong R, 2014 | China | Retrospective | 79 34 |
46 | 67 | Various platin based regime | 0.425 | 0.001 | 5 | S | 15 | ||
Hu CX, 2015 | China | Prospective Phase 3 | 236 118 |
47(42-57) | 16.3 | Gemcitabine +Cisplatin Gemcitabine + Pacitaxel |
0.902 | 0.611 | 0.692 | 0.009 | 4 | NS | 16 |
Zhang J, 2015 | China | Retrospective | 364 218 |
49(25-76) | 15.9 | Various platin based regime | 0.63 | 0.002 | 0.59 | 0.046 | 6 | S | 4 |