Skip to main content
. 2018;19(5):1169–1173. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.5.1169

Table 1.

Details of the Studies Inclued in the Meta-Analysis

Study Country Study Design Total Number of Patients Median Age Median Follow-up Time (Month) Treatment Arms HR (OS) P value (OS) HR (DFS) P value (DFS) Study Qulatiy Score Conclusion REF
Carey L,2012 USA Prospective Phase 2 102
71
52(28-83) 26 Cetuximab
Cetuximab+Carboplatin
0.381 0.354 4 NS 13
Fan Y,2012 China Prospective Phase 2 53
27
48(32-67) 24 Dosetaksel+Cisplatin Dosetaksel+Capesitabine 0.41 0.027 0.029 <0,001 3 S 11
Khalaf D,2013 Canada Retrospective 58 48.9 NR Various platin based regime 0.97 NR 5 NS 17
Garza CV, 2013 Canada Retrospective 153
58
53.2 NR Various platin based regime 0.57 0.002 5 S 14
Hong R, 2014 China Retrospective 79
34
46 67 Various platin based regime 0.425 0.001 5 S 15
Hu CX, 2015 China Prospective Phase 3 236
118
47(42-57) 16.3 Gemcitabine +Cisplatin
Gemcitabine + Pacitaxel
0.902 0.611 0.692 0.009 4 NS 16
Zhang J, 2015 China Retrospective 364
218
49(25-76) 15.9 Various platin based regime 0.63 0.002 0.59 0.046 6 S 4