Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 8;124(6):1426–1437. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00847.2017

Table 2.

Bone microarchitecture and bone static and dynamic properties

Young
Old
CON PTH CON PTH
Bone microarchitecture
 n 7 10 7 9
    Tb.Th, µm 21.2 ± 2.0 23.2 ± 2.4 19.6 ± 3.7 21.5 ± 3.0
    Tb.N, /mm2 6.6 ± 1.1 7.5 ± 1.2e 3.6 ± 0.6 5.5 ± 1.1
    Tb.Sp, µm 158.6 ± 29.4 149.8 ± 29.1 309.8 ± 52.5a 220.6 ± 41.3
Bone static properties: osteoblast activity
 n 7 10 7 9
    OS/BS, % 5.7 ± 1.1 5.1 ± 1.0 7.9 ± 1.6c 3.2 ± 0.7
    Ob.S/BS, % 0.7 ± 0.5 0.8 ± 0.3 0.3 ± 0.2 0.4 ± 0.1
Bone static properties: osteoclast activity
 n 8 11 9 9
    Oc.S/BS, % 1.8 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.6d 1.4 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.3
Bone dynamic properties
 n 8 8 8 8
    MAR, µm/day 0.90 ± 0.30 1.18 ± 0.30 0.57 ± 0.05 0.55 ± 0.04
    sLS/BS, % 1.44 ± 0.28 1.51 ± 0.13 0.78 ± 0.06 1.53 ± 0.38
    dLS/BS, % 0.70 ± 0.19 1.41 ± 0.29b,d,f 0.34 ± 0.07 0.88 ± 0.22
    MS/BS, % 1.42 ± 0.28 2.16 ± 0.32b 0.85 ± 0.18 1.65 ± 0.39
    BFR/BS, µm3·µm−2·day−1 0.01 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.01 0.01 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.01

Values are means ± SE; the sample size n represents the number of rats per group. CON, control; PTH, parathyroid hormone; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; OS/BS, osteoid surface-to-bone surface ratio; Ob.S/BS, osteoblast surface-to-bone surface ratio; Oc.S/BS, osteoclast surface-to-bone surface ratio; MAR, mineral apposition rate, sLS/BS, single-labeled surface-to-bone surface ratio; dLS/BS, double-labeled surface-to-bone surface ratio; MS/BS, mineralizing surfaces-to-bone surface ratio; BFR/BS, bone formation rate-to-bone surface ratio.

a

P < 0.050 vs. Young CON and Young PTH,

b

P < 0.050 vs. Old CON,

c

P < 0.050 vs. Old PTH,

d

P < 0.100 vs. Old PTH,

e

P < 0.100 vs. Old CON,

f

P < 0.050 vs. Young CON.