Table 3.

Change in target region activity with feedback

	Change in Target Region Activity, %
Participant	BNP	BP	UNP	UP
A	−47.2 ± 4.1	−18.6 ± 8.6	−47.7 ± 4.33	−41.1 ± 7.5
B	−7.6 ± 9.5*	−6.0 ± 6.7*	−4.4 ± 10.3†	+2.6 ± 7.2†
C	−50.0 ± 14.1	−48.0 ± 8.8	−66.6 ± 10.1	−53.2 ± 7.4
E	+5.4 ± 7.1*	−12.6 ± 7.9	−13.0 ± 9.3	+0.8 ± 10.7†
F	−66.2 ± 7.2	−55.4 ± 10.8	−58.6 ± 5.6	−66.6 ± 7.7
G	−29.1 ± 4.3	−20.7 ± 5.3	−14.9 ± 5.6	−9.0 ± 4.5
H	−43.3 ± 12.8	−14.0 ± 19.1*	−38.5 ± 13.6	−33.3 ± 16.4
I	−50.8 ± 7.0	−65.6 ± 11.6	−54.7 ± 4.7	−20.7 ± 6.7
J	−36.7 ± 10.4	−58.9 ± 7.4	−46.7 ± 7.3	−51.6 ± 9.5
K	−60.6 ± 8.2	−13.6 ± 16.8*	−78.8 ± 8.1	−50.6 ± 21
L	−21.2 ± 15.9	−32.7 ± 13.5	−41.7 ± 17.9	−32.8 ± 15.1
M	−40.8 ± 6.3	−70.2 ± 6.1	−58.3 ± 4.6	−73.1 ± 5.8

Values are means ± SD, where the mean is percent change from the control period amplitude and SD is the percentage of mean control period amplitude, for total cycle amplitude found in the target region for the feedback epoch with the lowest amplitude compared with baseline (n = 12, excluding participant D). Significance tests were performed on log-transformed cycle amplitude.

^*P < 0.05, significant difference (adjusted P value);

^†No significant difference.

Values that do not indicate a reduction in the target region with P < 0.001 significance are bold; differences for all other (unmarked) values are significant to adjusted P < 0.001. BNP, bilateral pedaling with feedback about the nonparetic limb; BP, bilateral pedaling with feedback about the paretic limb; UNP, unilateral nonparetic pedaling with feedback on same limb; UP, unilateral paretic pedaling with feedback on same limb.