Skip to main content
. 2018 May 23;19(6):1548. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061548

Table 1.

Optical property of acid-tolerant GFP-like proteins.

Color Protein λex/em a (nm) ε b (103 M−1 cm−1) QY c Bright-ness d Oligomeric State e (In Vitro/OSER) pKa f Resistance to Lysosomal Enzymes Ref.
Blue Sirius 355/424 15.0 0.24 3.6 mono/N.D. <3.0 Yes g [27]
mTagBFP2 399/454 50.6 (76.0) 0.64 (0.48) 32.4 (36.5) mono/oligo 2.7 (2.4) eqFP578-derivatives. Maybe no. [28]
Cyan mTurquoise2 434/474 30.0 (31.0) 0.93 (0.92) 27.9 (28.5) mono/mono 3.1 (3.6) avGFP-derivatives. Maybe no. [29] h [30]
mCerulean3 434/475 40.0 (29.0) 0.80 (0.80) 32.0 (23.2) mono/mono 3.2 (3.4) [31]
mTFP1 462/492 64.0 (53.0) 0.85 (0.85) 54.4 (45.1) mono/mono 4.3 (4.3) N.D. [32]
UV-excitable Green mT-Sapphire 399/511 44.0 (34.0) 0.60 (0.59) 26.4 (20.1) mono/mono 4.9 (4.8) avGFP-derivatives. Basically no. [24]
Green ECGFP 463/506 23.9 0.14 3.3 mono/N.D. <4.0 [33]
mEmerald 487/509 57.5 (62.0) 0.68 (0.75) 39.1 (46.5) mono/mono 6.0 (4.6) [34]
pH-tdGFP 488/515 N.D. N.D. N.D. tandem-dimer 4.8 [35]
Yellow-Green mVenus 515/527 105.0 (127.0) 0.64 (0.67) 67.2 (85.1) mono/mono 6.0 (5.4) [36]
Gamillus 504/519 83.0 0.90 74.7 mono/mono 3.4 Yes [12]
mNeonGreen 506/517 116.0 (113.0) 0.80 (0.80) 92.8 (90.4) mono/mono 5.7 (5.4) Maybe no [12] [37]
Orange mKOk 551/563 105.0 0.61 64.1 mono/N.D. 4.2 N.D. [38]
Red mRFP1 584/607 50.0 (55.0) 0.25 (0.35) 12.5 (19.3) mono/mono 4.5 (3.8) DsRed-derivatives. Basically yes. [39] [13]
mCherry 587/610 72.0 (85.0) 0.22 (0.30) 15.8 (25.5) mono/mono <4.5 (3.8) [14]
mCherry2 589/610 79.4 0.22 17.5 mono/N.D. 3.3 [15]
mStrawberry 574/596 90.0 0.29 26.1 mono/mono <4.5 [14]
mScarlet 569/594 100.0 0.70 70.0 mono/mono 5.3 [16]
mRuby 558/605 112.0 (109.0) 0.35 (0.38) 39.2 (41.4) mono/mono 4.4 (4.4) eqFP611-derivatives. Basically yes. [39] [18]
mRuby2 559/600 113.0 (107.0) 0.38 (0.37) 42.9 (39.6) mono/mono 5.3 (4.4) [19]
mRuby3 558/592 128.0 0.45 57.6 mono/N.D. 4.8 [20]
TagRFP 555/584 100.0 (130.0) 0.48 (0.33) 48.0 (42.9) mono/oligo 3.1 (3.0) eqFP578-derivatives. Basically no. [39] [21]
TagRFP-T 555/584 81.0 (106.0) 0.41 (0.32) 33.2 (33.9) mono/oligo 4.6 (4.3) [40]
FusionRed 580/608 83.0 (85.0) 0.19 (0.30) 15.8 (25.5) mono/mono 4.6 (4.2) [23]
Blue-excitable Red LSSmKate1 463/624 31.2 0.08 2.5 mono/N.D. 3.2 [25]
LSSmKate2 460/605 26.0 0.17 4.4 mono/N.D. 2.7 [25]
hmKeima4.15 436/612 28.0 0.29 8.1 mono/N.D. 5.2 mKeima-derivative. Maybe yes. [41]
Far Red mPlum 590/649 41.0 (80.0) 0.10 (0.13) 4.1 (10.4) mono/mono <4.5 (4.6) DsRed-derivatives. Maybe yes. [17]
mRaspberry 598/625 86.0 0.15 12.9 mono/mono <4.5 [17]
TagRFP657 611/657 34.0 0.10 3.4 mono/N.D. 3.4 eqFP578-derivatives. Maybe no. [22]

a Wavelength of excitation and emission peaks; b Molar extinction coefficient; c Fluorescence quantum yield; d Product of ε and QY, divided by 1000; e Oligomeric state of FPs determined by gel-filtration chromatography (in vitro) or OSER assay with mammalian cells; f pH at which fluorescence intensity becomes its half-maximal value; g Sirius is derived from avGFP, however it kept emitting fluorescence in phagosomes in Dictyostelium discoidium; h FPs from the same origin tend to show similar resistance to proteolytic degradation in lysosomes. Values without parentheses are from original articles. Values indicated in parentheses are referred from a paper [8]. N.D. indicates “Not Determined”.