Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 7;314(6):R870–R882. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00311.2017

Table 1.

Long-term hypoxia and potency of bradykinin-induced relaxation

Normoxic
Hypoxic
Condition Mean ± SE n Mean ± SE n
Control −8.72 ± 0.11 11/40 −7.34 ± 0.25b 16/28
l-NAME −8.70 ± 0.37 4/9 −7.40 ± 0.47 7/15
Indo −7.95 ± 0.13 3/11 −7.21 ± 0.36 4/10
TEA −7.66 ± 0.39a 3/6 −7.47 ± 0.13 5/7

Values are log concentration for the IC50 for bradykinin-induced relaxation for data presented graphically in Figs. 1, 4, 6, and 7; n, no. of arteries studied for each condition in each group. l-NAME, NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester; Indo, indomethacin; TEA, tetraethylammonium. aSignificant leftward shift in the IC50 compared with control and bsignificant difference in IC50 compared with normoxic counterpart [with the use of a 95% confidence interval based on the log(inhibitor) vs. response curve fit to the data].