Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 5;13(3):191–203. doi: 10.3727/000000006783991818

TABLE 1.

GENES DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN HYPOXIC AND CONTROL SAMPLES

True Hypoxia Hypoxia Mimicry
O2-Regulated Incubator 1 (n = 5) O2-Regulated Incubator 2 (n = 5) Billups-Rothenberg Chamber (n = 5)
100 μM Cobalt Chloride (n = 4)* 200 μM Cobalt Chloride (n = 4)*
Twofold change 169/70 168/46 123/147 236/713 311/705
Fourfold change 36/1 40/0 27/0 44/116 56/117
FDR <5% (limma) 781/1036 737/750 759/1427 1983/2116 2190/2286
Twofold change (mean) 145/56 196/667
FDR <5% (Welch test) 1016/1525 105/259

Probesets were selected by fold-change criterion (two- or fourfold, mean fold change was calculated either in each experiment separately or for three “true hypoxia” and two hypoxia mimicry experiments) or by statistical selection (limma, Bayesian moderated t-statistic for each experiment or classic Welch t-test for larger groups). False Discovery Rate (FDR) was estimated by Benjamini-Hochberg method. Numbers of probesets satisfying the criteria are given as “upregulated/downregulated.”

*

Two samples treated with 100 μM CoCl2 and two treated with 200 μM CoCl2 were compared to common controls (two samples).

Relatively low number of genes due to small number of samples compared.