Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 1;37(11):2080–2106. doi: 10.1111/risa.12758

Table VI.

Major Assumptions of the Model

Assumptions Related to Employee Practices/Behavior and Retail Setting
The food establishment includes one food preparation area and one restroom
Three workers are present in the food establishment, and two of these workers are food workers
Five shifts of eight hours were simulated, with 200 servings per food worker and per shift (total of 2,000 servings)
The food serving includes three ingredients, one of the ingredients is cooked
Food preparation and assembly tasks take place in five‐minute sequences
Contact between food, hands/gloves, and FCS occurs twice for each ingredient during food preparation and assembly
Contact between hands/gloves and NFCS occurs once for each ingredient during food preparation and assembly
The pace of sandwich assembly is 1 per minute
The pace of ingredient preparation is 20 pieces per minute
Restroom had two hand‐touch points: the hand sink faucet handle and the restroom door handle.
Settings studied in the literature used for the meta‐analyses are representative or comparable to this setting
Category “noncompliant 3” represents 50% of the proportion of total noncompliant
Assumptions Related to Illness and Norovirus
Ingredients are initially free of norovirus
Restroom, food facility, and food contact equipment are initially free of norovirus
Transmission of norovirus to customer only occurs through food
Only one employee (FE‐1) is symptomatic
Symptomatic employees always experience diarrhea
All assumptions from Teunis et al.32 dose–response models (infection and illness)
Assumptions Related to Data and Statistical Analysis
RT‐PCR data represent the number of norovirus particles in the dose–response model
All actions on norovirus particles (transfer, survival, washing, and disinfection) are applied independently on each particle
Norovirus surrogates have similar properties (up to a scaling factor) as norovirus (survival, transfer, handwashing, and disinfection)
Norovirus genogroup GI and GII have similar properties and infection probability