Skip to main content
. 2018 May 10;32(12):992–1000. doi: 10.1002/rcm.8126

Table 4.

– The measured and calculated carbon isotopic composition of amino acid α‐carboxyl groups. Values in bold are for internationally available RMs developed for inter‐laboratory calibration R

Reference material Nature δ 13CCARBOXYL ×1000, VPDB
expecteda measured MU (k = 2)b
99% 96%
USGS40 L‐glutamic acid −30.0 ± 0.9
USGS41a L‐glutamic acid +284.9 +275.2 +276.8 ± 0.9
USGS64 glycine G1 −37.7 ± 0.3
USGS65 glycine G2 −23.9 −24.3 −24.3 ± 0.3
USGS66 glycine G3 +16.6 +14.9 +14.7 ± 0.3
D01 L‐valine −5.6 ± 0.6
USGS73 L‐valine V1 −18.5 ± 0.5
USGS74 L‐valine V2 −2.8 −2.9 −2.7 ± 0.6
USGS75 L‐valine V3 +33.3 +32.1 +31.6 ± 0.3
TTA L‐alanine −31.60 ± 0.28 c −31.58 ± 0.3 d
TTS L‐alanine −27.98 ± 0.08 c −28.06 ± 0.1 d
TTW L‐alanine −28.85 ± 0.03 c −28.80 ± 0.2 d
a

Calculated from information supplied by Qi36 or Schimmelmann37 assuming either 99 or 96% purity of the α‐carboxyl labelled materials used.

b

Measurement uncertainty (MU) was determined from three sources, as explained in the text, using a coverage factor (k) of two. The reported MU is an error‐propagated SD, and multiplied by 2 to approximate a 95% confidence range for the reported mean value.

c

Values determined by off‐line reaction with ninhydrin.

d

Uncertainty for these materials is reported as ± one standard deviation for FIA/NR/IRMS anslysis.