Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0197977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197977

Table 3. Comparison between plasma Chromium levels in obesity, diabetes and dyslipidaemia in the study population.

Parameters Total (n = 331)
n (%)
Cr level (μg/l)
Mean ± SEM
p-value
WC (cm)
central obesity 108 (33.0%) 0.133 ± 0.01 <0.0001
Normal 223 (67.0%) 0.308 ± 0.02
BMI (Kg/m2)
Normal 220 (66.5%) 0.319 ± 0.03 1(reference)
Overweight 61 (18.4%) 0.217 ± 0.01 0.036
Obese 50 (15.1%) 0.139 ± 0.02 0.003
WHR
Normal 141 (42.6%) 0.355 ± 0.03 <0.0001
Obese 190 (57.4%) 0.138 ± 0.01
WHtR
Normal 147 (44.4%) 0.358 ± 0.02 <0.0001
Obese 184 (56.6%) 0.132 ± 0.01
WTR
Normal 268 (81.8%) 0.281 ± 0.01 <0.0001
Obese 63 (18.2%) 0.092 ± 0.02
FBG
Normal 181 (54.7%) 0.397 ± 0.02 <0.0001
Diabetic 150 (45.3%) 0.078 ± 0.01
TG (WHO Criteria)
Normal 268 (81.0%) 0.263 ± 0.01 0.844
Dyslipidaemia 63 (19.0%) 0.220 ± 0.04
TG (NCEP III Criteria)
Normal 259 (78.2%) 0.256 ± 0.01 0.828
Dyslipidaemia 72 (21.8%) 0.230 ± 0.04

Comparison of plasma Cr level in obesity, diabetes and dyslipidaemia in the study population

n (%): frequency (percentage). One-sample t-test was used in comparison between means Cr levels.p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

BG: Fasting blood Glucose, WHR: Waist to hip ratio; WTR: Waist to thigh ratio; WHtR: Waist to height ratio; BMI: Body mass index; WC: Waist circumference; HC: Hip circumference TG; triglycerides