Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Personal Disord. 2018 Feb 19;9(4):369–378. doi: 10.1037/per0000280

Table 2.

Summary of Multiple Regression Analyses Predicting Affective Instability

Variable Predicting Valence AI Predicting Arousal AI

B SE B β p pr B SE B β p pr
Step 1 (R2 = .06, p = .014) (R2 =.10, p = .002)
 BPD diagnosis 2.70 1.07 .25 .01 .25 2.78 .89 .31 .002 .31
Step 2 (ΔR2 = .15, p = .001) R2 = .12, p = .004 )
 BPD diagnosis .84 1.10 .08 .45 .08 1.54 .93 .17 .10 .17
 General Vocabulary −.31 .17 −.20 .07 −.19 −.04 .14 −.03 .80 −.03
 Semantic Valence Focus −20.83 9.41 −.28 .03 −.23 −17.62 7.93 −.28 .03 −.23
 Semantic Arousal Focus −22.52 7.82 −.39 .01 −.29 −22,74 6.58 −.46 .001 −.34
Step 3 (ΔR2 = .12, p = .546) R2 = .07, p = .051)
 BPD diagnosis 1.63 2.00 .15 .42 .09 .64 1.63 .07 .70 .04
 General Vocabulary −.30 .17 −.18 .09 −.18 −.01 .14 −.00 .99 −.00
 Semantic Valence Focus −21.04 9.50 −.28 .03 −.23 −16.61 7.75 −.26 .04 −.22
 Semantic Arousal Focus −20.09 8.05 −.35 .02 −.26 −18.83 6.57 −.38 .01 −.29
 NA −.00 .10 −.00 .98 −.00 .13 .09 .29 .14 .16
 PA .10 .07 .15 .15 .15 .15 .06 .25 .02 .26
 Negative Affect Intensity −.04 .89 −.01 .96 −.01 −.10 .72 −.03 .89 −.01

Note: B = unstandardized regression coefficient, SE = standard error, β = standardized regression coefficient, pr = partial correlation coefficient, AI = Affective Instability; BPD = Borderline Personality Disorder diagnosis; NA = Negative Affect; PA = Positive Affect.