Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Personal Disord. 2018 Feb 19;9(4):369–378. doi: 10.1037/per0000280

Table 3.

Summary of Multiple Regression Analysis Predicting Negative Affect Intensity

Variable Predicting Negative Affect Intensity

B SE B β p pr
Step 1 (R2 = .69, p = .000)
 BPD diagnosis 2.08 .15 .83 .00 .83
Step 2 (ΔR2 = .01, p = .636)
 BPD diagnosis 2.09 .16 .83 .00 .81
 General Vocabulary .02 .03 .06 .38 .09
 Semantic Valence Focus −1.27 1.31 −.07 .34 −.10
 Semantic Arousal Focus −.67 1.00 −.05 .51 −.07
Step 3 (ΔR2 = .10, p = .000)
 BPD diagnosis 1.00 .21 .40 .00 .45
 General Vocabulary .03 .02 .09 .12 .17
 Semantic Valence Focus −.37 1.09 −.02 .74 −.04
 Semantic Arousal Focus −.07 .84 −.01 .93 −.01
 NA .07 .01 .57 .00 .58
 PA .00 .00 .02 .77 .03

Note: B = unstandardized regression coefficient, SE = standard error, β = standardized regression coefficient, pr = partial correlation coefficient, AI = Affective Instability; BPD = Borderline Personality Disorder diagnosis; NA = Negative Affect; PA = Positive Affect.