Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2018 Aug;43(4):746–755. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0479-z

Table 3.

Multiple Logistic Regression Model Predicting Household Smoking Ban Status among Adult Citizens Participating in the 2014 Cherokee Nation American Indian Adult Tobacco Survey

Characteristics Partial Ban/No Ban
OR (95% CIs) aOR (95% CIs)
Age (In Years)
 18–34 Referent Referent
 35–64 1.40 (1.35, 1.216) 1.71 (1.58, 1.84)
 ≥65 1.14 (1.07, 1.22) 3.12 (2.64, 3.69)
Sex
 Male 1.15 (1.11, 1.19) 1.38 (1.28, 1.49)
 Female Referent Referent
Education Level
 < High school diploma/GED 3.23 (3.04, 3.43) 1.07 (0.92, 1.26)
 High school graduate/GED 1.99 (1.90, 2.08) 1.57 (1.45, 1.71)
 Some college (no degree) 1.26 (1.20, 1.34) 0.90 (0.81, 1.00)
 Technical/college degree or higher Referent Referent
Household Income
 $0-$15,000 3.76 (3.52, 4.03) 3.71 (3.17, 4.34)
 $15,001-$30,000 2.37 (2.23, 2.52) 2.73 (4.43, 3.07)
 $30,001-$45,000 1.40 (1.31–1.51) 1.50 (1.33, 1.68)
 ≥$45,001 Referent Referent
 Missing/Unknown 1.96 (1.86, 2.06) 1.42 (1.30, 1.56)
Respondent Smoking Status
 Current smoker 5.95 (5.71, 6.20) 2.71 (2.51, 2.94)
 Former smoker 1.11 (1.06, 1.18) 0.72 (0.66, 0.81)
 Never smoker Referent Referent
Household Smoking Status
 Yes 5.81 (5.59, 6.03) 5.82 (5.40, 6.27)
 No Referent Referent
Ceremonial Tobacco Use
 Yes Referent Referent
 No 0.29 (0.27, 0.30) 1.01 (0.89, 1.16)
SHS Risk Perception
 Very or somewhat harmful Referent Referent
 Not very harmful 2.92 (5.34, 6.83) 1.52 (1.29, 1.79)
 Not harmful 6.039 (5.34–6.83) 1.25 (0.86, 1.82)
Overall Health
 Good to excellent health Referent Referent
 Fair health 1.88 (1.79, 2.00) 0.87(0.78–0.97)
 Poor health 3.01 (2.81, 3.23) 4.63 (3.74, 5.72)
Seen by Healthcare Provider
 Yes Referent Referent
 No 1.40 (1.34, 1.46) 2.08 (1.92, 2.26)
Presence of Children
 Yes Referent Referent
 No 1.55 (1.50, 1.61) 2.46 (2.29, 2.65)