Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 29;9:284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00284

Table 3.

Task characteristics and results of the 10 studies included in the meta-analysis.

Author (year) Task design n of trials Target amplitude Cue latencies Results: mean latencies Results: error rates Results: SD of latencies
(22) step 10–16 ~10° OCD > CON
(19) step, gap, or 200 ms overlap 120 10, or 20° 2,000–2,500 ms OCD > CON OCD = CON
(20) step 36 8, 16, or 24° 1,500–2,500 ms OCD = CON OCD > CON (8°)
OCD = CON (16°)
OCD = CON (24°)
(18) step 106 10, or 15° 2,000–2,500 ms OCD > CON OCD = CON
(21) step 20 12° 700, 1,000, or 1,300 ms OCD = CON OCD = CON
(23) 200 ms gap 50 1,000 ms OCD > CON OCD = CON
(16) overlap 40 1,000–2,000 ms OCD = CON OCD = CON
(17) 200 ms overlap 50 16° 1,500, 2,000, 2,500, or 3,000 ms OCD > CON (only interaction term with prosaccades) OCD > CON
(14) 200 ms gap; 50% trials with distractor; 40% without distractor, 10% fake-hard; twice: during fMRI and EEG 384 (EEG)
512 (fMRI)
10° 2,000 ms OCD = CON (EEG)
OCD = CON (fMRI)
OCD = CON (EEG)
OCD > CON (fMRI)
(15) step 90 2–10°
(1° intervals)
1,000–2,000 ms OCD = CON OCD > CON OCD > CON

CON, healthy control subjects; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; SD, standard deviation.

Hyphens indicate that the specific characteristic was not reported.