Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Oral Biol. 2018 Jan 19;88:19–23. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.01.010

Table 3.

Distribution of dental anomalies among individuals with and without third molar agenesis.

Third Molar Agenesis (%) 93b (11.2) No Third Molar Agenesis (%) 738b (88.8) p-value Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Dental Anomalies n (%)
Agenesis 16 (17.2) 41 (5.6) > 0.01a 3.52 (1.89–6.59)
Supernumerary 3 (3.2) 24 (3.3) 0.989 0.99 (0.29–3.36)
Microdontia 11 (11.8) 24 (3.3) > 0.01a 3.99 (1.89–8.44)
Macrodontia – 2 (0.3) 0.615 1.13 (1.09–1.15)
Impaction 38 (40.9) 478 (64.8) > 0.01a 3.3 (1.72–4.16)
Transposition 2 (2.2) 29 (3.9) 0.394 0.54 (0.13–2.29)
Giroversion 35 (37.6) 327 (44.3) 0.221 0.76 (0.49–1.18)
Root Dilaceration 2 (2.2) 18 (2.4) 0.864 0.88 (0.20–3.85)
Crown Dilaceration – 1 (0.1) 0.722 1.13 (1.10–1.15)
Odontoma 1 (1.1) 1 (0.1) 0.081 8.01 (0.50–129.16c)
Taurodontism – 1 (0.1) 0.722 1.13 (1.10–1.15)

Notes: P-value is based on chi-square test.

a

Statistically significant (p < 0.05).

b

216 patients were excluded because it was not possible to diagnose third molar agenesis.

c

Unstable numbers due to low frequency.