Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010 Sep;47(5):476–481. doi: 10.1597/08-177

TABLE 4.

Team Care and Outcomes of Care by Timing of Cleft Diagnosis*

Cleft Diagnosis Prenatally (n = 46) Cleft Diagnosis at Birth (n = 116) p Value
Team care
 Yes 35 (76.1) 90 (77.6) .838
 No 11 (23.9) 26 (22.4)
Number of surgeries
 1 13 (28.3) 37 (32.7) .660
 2 17 (37.0) 41 (36.3)
 3 10 (21.7) 27 (23.9)
 4 or more 6 (13.0) 8 (7.1)
More surgeries planned
 Yes 35 (79.6) 83 (74.1) .476
 No 9 (20.4) 29 (25.9)
Surgery complications
 Yes 4 (8.7) 8 (7.0) .715
 No 42 (91.3) 106 (93.0)
Rating of cleft care, low (0) to high (10)
 0–7 6 (13.0) 9 (7.8) .251
 8 11 (23.9) 19 (16.4)
 9 11 (23.9) 23 (19.8)
 10 18 (39.1) 65 (56.0)
Satisfaction with facial appearance
 Child happy with appearance (not at all to moderately) 9 (28.1) 17 (18.9) .273
 Mother happy with appearance (not at all to moderately) 14 (30.4) 18 (15.5) .032
Speech problems
 Frustrated when speaks (sometimes, usually, or always) 24 (53.3) 47 (41.2) .167
 Avoids talking (sometimes, usually, or always) 5 (11.1) 19 (16.7) .378
 Difficulty being understood by acquaintances (sometimes, usually, or always) 20 (44.4) 42 (36.8) .376
 Difficulty being understood by nonacquaintances (sometimes, usually, or always) 27 (60.0) 57 (50.0) .255
Difficulty being understood overall (sometimes, usually, or always) 27 (60.0) 50 (43.9) .067