Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J LGBT Youth. 2017 Sep 1;14(4):436–444. doi: 10.1080/19361653.2017.1365038

Table 2.

Acceptability of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Among Young MSM Overall and by Socio-Demographic Characteristics

Text-Messaged-Based EMA %(n) %(n) p value
Yes No
Overall Sample 95.9 (71) 4.0 (3)
Race/Ethnicity .759
 White or Caucasian 100.0 (17) 0.0 (0)
 Black or African American 96.0 (24) 4.0 (1)
 Hispanic or Latino 90.5 (19) 9.5 (2)
 Asian or Pacific Islander 100.0 (4) 0 (0)
 Multiracial or other 100.0 (6) 0.0 (0)
Individual Annual Income
 Less than $15,000 94.6 (35) 5.4 (2) .999
 $15,000 to $35,000 96.3 (26) 3.7 (1)
 Greater than $35,000 100.0 (8) 0.0 (0)
Educational Attainment .999
 High school or less 95.6 (43) 4.4 (2)
 Some college/technical school 100.0 (8) 0.0 (0)
 College degree or more 95.2 (20) 4.8 (9)
Has a partner currently .242
 Yes 100.0 (35) 0.0 (0)
 No 92.3 (36) 7.7 (3)

Voice-Based EMA %(n) %(n) p value
Yes No

Overall Sample 89.2 (66) 10.8 (8)
Race/Ethnicity .583
 White or Caucasian 82.4 (14) 17.6 (3)
 Black or African American 84.0 (21) 16.0 (4)
 Hispanic or Latino 95.2 (20) 4.8 (1)
 Asian or Pacific Islander 100.0 (4) 0 (0)
 Multiracial or other 100.0 (6) 0.0 (0)
Individual Annual Income
 Less than $15,000 83.8 (31) 16.2 (6) .473
 $15,000 to $35,000 92.6 (25) 7.4 (2)
 Greater than $35,000 100.0 (8) 0.0 (0)
Educational Attainment
 High school or less 91.1 (41) 8.9 (4) .645
 Some college/technical school 87.5 (7) 12.5 (1)
 College degree or more 85.7 (18) 14.3 (3)
Has a partner currently .464
 Yes 85.7 (30) 14.3 (5)
 No 92.3 (36) 7.7 (3)