Table 3.
Hierarchical binary logistic regression models for excessive online gaming
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | OR | 95% CI for OR | B | OR | 95% CI for OR | B | OR | 95% CI for OR | |
| Constant | −2.281 | 0.102 | −2.537 | 0.079 | −2.559 | 0.077 | |||
| Gender (girl = ref. +) | 2.575 | 13.137 | (9.628, 17.924)** | 2.559 | 12.924 | (9.466, 17.645)** | 2.560 | 12.931 | (9.471, 17.655)** |
| School (grammar school = ref. +) | |||||||||
| Secondary with graduation | 0.279 | 1.322 | (1.032, 1.695) | 0.317 | 1.372 | (1.069, 1.763) | 0.318 | 1.374 | (1.069, 1.767) |
| Vocational | 0.016 | 1.016 | (0.786, 1.315) | 0.096 | 1.101 | (0.844, 1.435) | 0.097 | 1.102 | (0.844, 1.440) |
| Age (in years) | −0.108 | 0.898 | (0.800, 1.007) | −0.091 | 0.913 | (0.812, 1.025) | −0.090 | 0.914 | (0.813, 1.028) |
| Daily smoking (no = ref. +) | −0.380 | 0.684 | (0.514, 0.910)** | −0.380 | 0.684 | (0.513, 0.911)** | |||
| Binge drinking (no = ref. +) | 0.054 | 1.055 | (0.860, 1.296) | 0.053 | 1.055 | (0.859, 1.295) | |||
| Marijuana use (no = ref. +) | −0.029 | 0.972 | (0.778, 1.214) | −0.029 | 0.972 | (0.777, 1.215) | |||
| Family composition (complete family = ref. +) | |||||||||
| Reconstructed | 0.031 | 1.032 | (0.773, 1.377) | ||||||
| Other | −0.031 | 0.969 | (0.774, 1.214) | ||||||
| Hosmer and Lemeshow testa | 9.263 | 3.547 | 2.472 | ||||||
| Sig. | 0.321 | 0.896 | 0.963 | ||||||
| Nagelkerke R2 | 0.185 | 0.188 | 0.188 | ||||||
Note. Dependent variable: excessive online gaming (coded as 1), non-excessive online gaming (coded as 0). OR: odds ratio.
a
Hosmer–Lemeshow statistics indicates a poor fit if the significance value is less than 0.05.
**
p < .01.